Following the recent publication of his successful articles on measurement uncertainty, Stephen MacDonald returns with the first in a new series looking at internal quality control in laboratory medicine.
The role of quality control in the laboratory has changed substantially over the last 70 years (Fig 1). Quality requirements have changed in line with developments in technology, automation and efficiency, leading to quality improvement being firmly established in working practices. It is the role of quality control (QC) within this context that will be covered in this series.
Using internal quality control (IQC) as a surrogate for assay performance is familiar to us in pathology laboratories. We often use it as the basis of our quantification of measurement uncertainty. Statistical quality control (SQC) is the next generation of IQC. For it to be useful we need to be assured that we are using the right quality control process… and doing it right.
It is unsurprising that we in pathology laboratories did not come up with the idea of quality control. In industry, statistical measures, and their application to quality processes, are commonplace. Ranging from the Student’s t-test – developed as a measure of quality control in Guinness production in 1908 by William Gosset1 – to the advent of Six Sigma processes in the 1980s, quality control has been used throughout industry to drive quality improvement.
Log in or register FREE to read the rest
This story is Premium Content and is only available to registered users. Please log in at the top of the page to view the full text.
If you don't already have an account, please register with us completely free of charge.