Sponsors

Greater confidence in quality control compliance with moving averages

Jonathan Horan looks at how laboratories can move forward to the more comprehensive quality control regime that regulators now demand, and how Beckman Coulter can assist in this process.

The concept of a ‘moving average’ was first introduced in the financial sector to carry out technical analysis of stock prices, housing markets, gross domestic product or unemployment levels. It is now attracting increased attention from the UK’s pathology services after changes to the inspection regime. Laboratory managers want to incorporate patient data analysis to provide greater confidence in the test results being reported between quality control (QC) runs.

Running a sample of known concentration and using this to check equipment calibration remains the basis of good QC. However, it is no longer sufficient to rely on periodic reagent checks. These are usually run only three or four times every 24 hours, as to run them more frequently would be too expensive and time-consuming. Quality control is usually performed after maintenance and calibration when the system is at peak performance. In addition, ‘matrix effects’ or interference from components in the QC sample can have a considerable effect on the consistency of material QC figures.
 Using patient data analysis is an important complement to commercial QC. ISO 15189 requires a laboratory to “evaluate the results from patient samples that were examined after the last successful quality control event”. Indeed, it goes further, requiring that “statistical and non-statistical techniques for process control should be used wherever possible to continuously monitor examination system performance”. With software such as REMISOL Advance, a moving average (MA) calculation can run in the background, bringing consistent, uninterrupted monitoring for minimal additional cost.

The more advanced exponential analysis gives greater weight to more recent results and this type of MA calculation is seen as offering the greater potential to UK laboratories (Fig 1). While individual results may vary greatly, the mean for any given parameter should remain roughly constant. Using MA continuous analysis, any variations or ‘drifts’ can be indicators of problems with samples, analysers, reagents or other factors.

Log in or register FREE to read the rest

This story is Premium Content and is only available to registered users. Please log in at the top of the page to view the full text. If you don't already have an account, please register with us completely free of charge.

Latest Issues

Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) 2024 Annual Meeting & Expo

Hyatt Regency, Vancouver, Canada
19-23 November, 2024

11th Digital Pathology & AI Congress: Europe

Hilton London Metropole, 255 Edgware Road, London, W2 1JU
11-12 December, 2024

Microbiology Society Annual Conference 2025

Liverpool Arena and Convention Centre
31 March - 3 April, 2025

BSMT Annual Microbiology Conference

RAF Museum, Hendon, London NW9 5LL
15 May, 2025

Ghent Pathology 2025

ICC Ghent, Belgium
24-26 June, 2025